As our readers know, I am on the recently formed Transfer Review Committee for TSD. We had our second meeting on December 9th and made a little progress so I wanted to provide an update.
We took what we discussed at the last meeting and made some decisions for recommendations for Superintendent Dotson. He plans to take our recommendations and draft a policy for Inter-zone transfers. We have yet to delve deeply into the nonresident student policy, which I hope will be done at the upcoming meetings.
Sean Dotson asked the group to approve(via a vote) some basic principles which surrounded prioritizing transfer requests. These are the suggestions from the committee(as I understood them), which will be presented to the Board for consideration:
- Changing the nomenclature to match what is in the statutes. “Inter-zone” student instead of “intra-district” student and “non-resident” student instead of “inter-district” student.
- Give School Staff children first priority, before any transfer student, including inter-zone and nonresident renewals, siblings etc.
- Give all inter-zone transfers priority over any non-resident student, including renewals, siblings, etc.
- With-in the inter-zone transfers, give students displaced by the boundary change priority over other transfer students. However, the priority only applies to students currently enrolled in the schools and lasts only until those students finish 5th grade since the middle schools and high school boundaries were not changed. As an example, a transfer student at the elementary school would be given no priority when applying at the middle(or high) school, with no priority to siblings who are not currently enrolled in the elementary school.
For the next meeting:
I hope we address some of the non-resident transfer procedures at our next meeting. I am hopeful that the District is trying to address the concerns brought up in the Thought Exchange. From the comments and ratings in the Thought Exchange it appears that the general desire was to limit and possibly phase out most non-resident transfers to the extent possible. The committee has yet to delve into that work, but I am hoping to get there.
As a side note, in our meeting, the comment was made that “since the State gives us money for the nonresident transfers shouldn’t we just accept as many as apply?”. If you are still unclear about how the funding for students works and how non-resident students impact the budget you can check out Scott’s blog from a few months ago, here. In short, the per student cost TSD reports to OSPI is about $2000 higher than what the state actually provides to the district per student. The district fills that gap with levy funds collected from Tumwater taxpayers. While the manner in which TSD has accepted non-resident students in the past has had a negative effect on the budget, with a more deliberate process, strategically placed non-resident students could actually have a positive effect on the budget. Scott and I are optimistic that such a result will be part of the a product of the transfer committee’s recommendations.
Superintendent Dotson indicated he would work on drafting some policies and procedures consistent with the above and we will discuss those policies and procedures at the next meeting which is set for January 13, 2020.
In the interim, I would welcome any input for consideration by the Committee.
The Community Forum is scheduled for January 27, 2020 from 7-8:30 at Tumwater Middle School.
During this forum, the committee will present its original recommendations. This will be your opportunity to ask questions and to let the Committee and the District know what your thoughts are on the process and the procedures we have drafted up to that point. Mark your calendars and plan to attend.
To see what happened at the first meeting you can read my recap here.
As always, we welcome your feedback and questions. Contact us at email@example.com